| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
3675
   |
Posted - 2017.01.06 00:11:57 -
[1] - Quote
Just another carebear...
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"
Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
|
Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
3675
|
Posted - 2017.01.06 01:23:17 -
[2] - Quote
Zhilia Mann wrote:So to not be entirely negative, the most viable suggestion of this whole lot is to put war dec fees (some or all of them) into a pool. If the dec corp fails to get kills, or loses more ships than it kills, then the targeted corp gets paid out of the pool.
If you want to play around with that concept, go for it. Everything else is, for various reasons, not going to work. Even this one is pushing it, but I definitely see it as the most workable suggestion.
Get decced.
Everyone but an alt drops corp.
Start new corp for a measly 1mil.
Everyone joins new corp.
Dec against first corp ends with no kills.
Profit.
Defenders shouldn't get paid unless the attackers agree as some form of treaty.
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"
Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
|
Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
3675
|
Posted - 2017.01.06 02:35:27 -
[3] - Quote
I'm all for giving defenders a way to 'win' but am convinced the objective shouldn't be about ships destroyed nor the reward be materialistic.
Corp starter fees are obviously out of whack when compared to dec fees and corp hopping is an issue.
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"
Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
|
Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
3692
|
Posted - 2017.01.12 01:40:12 -
[4] - Quote
Donnachadh wrote:
In the past it was rather rare to see a larger war dec group declaring war against a smaller group because we all knew that it was not conducive to the fights we were looking for, today it is common for large war dec groups to declare war on 1-5 man corps and then complain when those smaller groups will not un-dock and fight.
Not true. 'curb stomping' decs and decs driven by killboards have always been happening. Wardeccers also decced groups smaller than themselves.
Quote:Shift things to far to the safety side and you risk losing one group of players and their cash, make it to dangerous and you risk losing a different set of players and their cash. Given the way changes to war decs have gone over the years with increased safety it is clear that there is more cash to be made by making things safer .
The players who leave because the game is 'dangerous' are players that don't stick around anyways. CCP made things safer, game subscriptions fell. This entire section is tripe.
Players aren't staying cause they aren't getting into pvp. They aren't getting into pvp because barriers and penalties into pvp keep getting higher.
80% of the players base is in hi-sec. Hi-sec pvp gets nerfed to ****. Bye bye game.
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"
Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
|
| |
|